Picosecond high speed ICCD camera family:
4 Picos

Highlights

  • Gate time down to 200ps rectangular
  • Dynamic range up to 32bit using the Dynamic Range Expansion System
  • High resolution (HR) CCD 1360 x 1024 pixel
  • Multiple exposure repetition rate up to 10MHz
  • CameraLink or USB 2.0 remote control
  • Coupling lens between phosphor and CCD sensor for absolutely distortion-free image
  • Single photon detection
  • Spectral sensitivity from UV to NIR
    (not all in one, depends on type of photocathode)
iccd camera 4 picos


    Datasheet     |     Drawing     |      Applications

 

Overview

4 Picos ICCD Camera - fastest intensified CCD camera

ultra fast gated ICCD camera
Based on more than 20 years of excellence in the development and progression of world-class, fast-gated Intensified CCD (ICCD) cameras, Stanford Computer Opitcs sets new standards of rapid, picosecond time-resolved spectroscopy and imaging with the introduction of the 4 Picos ICCD camera family.

The 4 Picos ICCD camera series contains the very best from CCD sensor and gated image intensifier technologies. It is achieving a superior combination of rapid acquisition rates and ultra-high sensitivity down to single photon. Exceptional detection performances are accessed through high quantum-efficiency (QE) image intensifiers, up to 3.3 MHz photocathode gating rates (burst).

Extrem low jitter, low insertion delay gating electronics and picosecond-scale optical gating provide excellent timing accuracy down to 10 picoseconds, allowing ultra-precise synchronisation of complex experiments through 4 Picos ICCD camera series comprehensive range of triggering options and input/outputs interface.

Technical Details

 

Parameter

4 Picos, digital HR 4 Picos, digital SR 4 Picos analog
Internal exposure time 200ps - 80s min. steps 10ps, fastest available
External exposure time 200ps ... DC, fastest available
Trigger propagation delay internal gate pulse: 60-65ns, less than 10ps jitter
external gate pulse: 30-35ns, no jitter
Multiple exposure any seqence, min. time step 0.3µs
Dynamic range A/D
(EIA/CCIR analog)
14bit, up to 21bit with 4 Spec E image and data acquisition software
with all lines integrated (binned), dynamic expansion active
Sensitivity of system more than 1count/photoelectron pixel
up to 80s integration time on CCD
Camera digital output standard: CameraLink, optional: USB 2.0 -
CCD output 12bit
14bit
12bit
14bit
EIA (Japan, USA)
CCIR (elsewhere)
CCD resolution 1360 x 1024 pixel
(HR) High Resolution
782 x 582 pixel
(SR) Standard Resolution
768 x 494 (EIA)
752 x 582 (CCIR)
CCD pixel size 4.7 x 4.7µm 8.3 x 8.3µm 8.4 x 9.8µm (EIA)
8.6 x 8.3µm (CCIR)
Binning 1x1 (full frame)
2x2 (binning)
ROI (region of interest)
-
Frame rate (1x1/2x2/ROI) 10.6 / 17.9 / 20.9fps 33.8 / 60.8 / 67.0fps -
Image Frequency (analog) - - 30/60Hz (EIA)
25/50Hz (CCIR)
Gain  1x1, ROI: 0..20db, 2x2: 0..25db remote control RS232
Scan mode field/frame, selectable through computer RS232 interface
Optical interface C-mount (standard), F-mount (optional)
Coupling lens customized relay coupling lens between image intensifier -> CCD
no distortion, best image quality up to 180 lines/mm
Image intensifier standard: 18mm; image area: 14.4 x 10.8mm;
optional: 25mm; image area: 20 x 15mm
Photocathode standard: S20 (UV), S25 (IR) others on request
Spectral sensitivity UV  - NIR, depending on the photocathode
Phosphor screen P43 (P46 on request)
Camera dimensions 248 x 110 x 135mm (l x w x h), without objective lens
Camera weight 3kg, all in one head, without objective lens
Camera mount 1/4" x 20 and M8 mounting hole at the bottom of the camera
Power Supply 12V ±5%

FAQ

Most ICCD cameras on the market show strong honeycomb structures. Why don't yours?

Very slight honeycomb structures originate from the image intensifiers micro channel plate that is an agglomeration of parallel oriented hexagonal fiber bundles. By using premium quality image intensifiers these structures are so slight that they are indeed not visible in almost all applications. However, clearly visible honeycomb structures are usually added to the image by optical fiber tapers that transfer the light emitted from the image intensifiers phosphor screen towards the CCD sensor. For this reason, we use only in-house developed telecentric coupling lenses instead of fiber tapers to avoid any additional honeycomb structures and furthermore to assure absolute distortion free imaging.

What is the difference between field rate and frame rate?

In contrast to progressive scan in interlaced video technique the pictures on the screen are built up by a sequence of fields which are only the half of a frame. Each frame is divided into two fields where one of both contains the even rows only and the other one contains the odd rows only. Instead for showing 30 frames per second for example, 60 fields are shown per second. Because of the doubled repetition frequency this concept results in a much more flicker-free video reproduction.

What does GenII or GenIII mean?

When night vision devices were originally developed their image intensifiers were bulky and less sensitive units. Improvements were developed later on and from the second generation of image intensifiers, the GenII intensifiers, the innovative multi channel plate was utilized. GenII intensifiers are equipped with different types of photocathode materials, that allow to customize the image intensifier to the spectral requirements of the specific application. However, photocathodes of GenII intensifiers provide quantum efficiencies of the order of only 25%.

GenIII intensifiers, the third generation, also use the highly effective multi channel plate. But, in addition, they offer gallium arsenide photocathodes that feature quantum efficiencies of more than 50%. A selection of available photocathode materials is shown here.

What is the main functional difference between ICCD cameras and EMCCD cameras?

An ICCD camera contains a CCD sensor and an image intensifier mounted in front of it. The image intensifier multiplies the incoming photons and supplies the CCD sensor with a large number of photons even under extreme low-light conditions. Thus, the number of photons collected by the CCD sensor is always much larger than the number of photons originating from the darc current noise. For this reason, there is indeed no need for cooling an ICCD camera.

An EMCCD camera does not contain an image intensifier but an electron multiplying CCD sensor. The incoming photons are directly collected by the CCD sensor. The photo electrons generated by the sensor are then read out and afterwards multiplied electronically in a multi-stage gain register. For this reason, EMCCD cameras need extremely strong cooling, because the electrons originating from the darc current noise are of the same order of magnitude than the signal electrons under low-light conditions and are amplified together with them to the same extend.

Because EMCCD cameras do not include an image intensifier they do not provide fast gating capability as ICCD cameras do.

What is the free running mode?

In the free running mode the camera is periodically gated by the built-in trigger source. The trigger frequency and the field and frame rates resulting therefrom depend on the camera model. E.g. a camera containing an EIA standard video unit runs with 30/60 Hz frame/field rate, whereas a CCIR standard video unit gives 25/50 Hz frame/field rates. Thus, in the free running mode your ICCD camera behaves like a normal video camera.

My camera always shows perpetual fluctuations in image brightness when operated in the free running mode?

This is a typical effect when the camera is operated in free running mode in rooms where artificial lighting is present. The lighting runs with 60 Hz alternated current, hence the illumination of the scene will fluctuate by 120 Hz. On the other hand the cameras shutter is not synchronized to the lightings mains and the exposure time will be much shorter than 1/120 second. So, successive images are taken at different illumination levels each resulting in the observable image brightness fluctuations.

Is cooling always necessary for ICCD cameras for low light conditions?

Yes and no. Cooling the CCD sensor strongly reduces the darc current. Because the noise of the darc current is derived as the darc currents square root the noise is also reduced by cooling the sensor. And, the lower the darc current noise compared to the signals noise the better.

But, ICCD cameras amplify the incoming light itself by means of the image intensifier, so that the CCD sensor detects the already amplified light signal. Hence, the sensor delivers a large signal, also under low light conditions, and thereby also a larger signal noise which again is given by the square root of the signal itself. For this reason its normally not neccessary to decrease the sensors darc current noise by cooling because the noise of the already amplified signal is even higher anyway, at least as long as the sensors temperature does not significantely exceed 30° Celsius.

Please note: This does not impact the signal to noise ratio, because the signal itself is still amplified and scales with the square of the noise. For more information, please see also here.

Are less bits in the A/D conversion would work as well as superior 16 bit A/D converters.

This can obviously not be true. You should not start thinking about this matter by calculating the mathematical resolution of technical A/D converters. Just start with considering the physically given shot noise of the measured light signal. The shot noise is given by the square root of the signals average value. Hence, the shot noise always confiscates the lower significant half of the number of bits that are needed to code the signals average value. So, the usage of more bits in the A/D conversion can indeed not increase resolution or dynamic range because both are in fact limited by the signals shot noise level that lies far above the technical resolution limit anyway. For moe information, please see also here.

I cannot believe its possible to increase resolution and dynamic range without increasing the number of bits in the A/D conversion?

Each A/D conversion gives a certain minimum quantization step. The more bits are used, the smaller the resulting quantization step. However, the resulting values are still digital values. On the other hand a simple mathematical average process following the A/D conversion is of course able to yield real analog values that are not restricted to any quantization levels. This is what frame adding does. Instead of increasing the exposure time of the CCD sensor it adds an equivalent number of short time exposures together in the computer after the A/D conversion. The result is a real analog value. For mor information, please see also here.

I was told that bright light conditions will damage the image intensifier of my ICCD camera?

You can put your mind at rest, they do not. What gives you "watermarks" on the photocathode is not the light intensity onto the camera but a much too high photocurrent over a longer period of time. The photocurrent is proportional to the product of light intensity and gating time which means, that if the light intensity is high, the exposure time has to be short to avoid watermarks. This indeed is a intuitive control process, because if the light intensity is high and the exposure time too long the image will be strongly overexposed. In this case you will reduce exposure time anyway.

If you would like to feel more confident about this we would be pleased to upgrade your camera to automatic exposure control.

Publications

Author Year Title
S. Zhang, et al. 2013 Spatially resolved ozone densities and gastemperatures in a time modulated RFdriven atmospheric pressure plasma jet:an analysis of the production anddestruction mechanisms
S. Cheng, et al. 2013 Flexible endoscope for continuous in vivo multispectral fluorescence lifetime imaging
S. Döringa, et al. 2013 Hole formation process in ultrashort pulse laser percussion drilling
D. Dobrynin, et al. 2013 Non-equilibrium nanosecond-pulsed plasma generation in the liquid phase (water, PDMS) without bubbles: fast imaging, spectroscopy and leader-type mode.
Y. Seepersad, et al. 2013

To the electrostrictive mechanism of nanosecond-pulsed breakdown in liquid phase

H.A. Al‐Attar, et al. 2012

Controlled energy transfer between isolated donor-acceptor molecules intercalated in thermally self-ensemble two-dimensional hydrogen bonding cages

A. M'hamedi, et al. 2012

Dinuclear iridium (iii) complexes of cyclometalated fluorenylpyridine ligands as phosphorescent dopants for efficient solution-processed OLEDs

J.E. Phipps, et al. 2012

A fluorescence lifetime imaging classification method to investigate the collagen to lipid ratio in fibrous caps of atherosclerotic plaque

L. Marcu, et al. 2012

Fluorescence Lifetime Spectroscopy and Imaging in Neurosurgery

H.A. Al‐Attar, et al. 2012

Room‐Temperature Phosphorescence From Films of Isolated Water‐Soluble Conjugated Polymers in Hydrogen‐Bonded Matrices

P. Le Delliou, et al. 2011

Nanosecond Pulsed Discharge Phenomenology in Micrometer-Sized Radially Confined Air Gap

J. Jansky, et al. 2011

Propagation of an air discharge at atmospheric pressure in a capillary glass tube: influence of the tube radius on the discharge structure

A. Starikovskiy, et al. 2011

Nonequilibrium Liquid Plasma Generation

A. Starikovskiy, et al. 2011

Streamer Breakdown Development in Undercritical Electric Field

X. Shiwei, et al. 2011

Design and implementation of the laser range-gating imaging synchronization control system

M.A.H. Chowdury, et al. 2011

Spectral investigation and laser action in solid films of fluorene-dibenzothiophene-s, s-dioxide co-polymers

A. Kumar, et al. 2011

Image analysis of expanding laser-produced lithium plasma plume in variable transverse magnetic field

J. Phipps, et al. 2011

Fluorescence lifetime imaging for the characterization of the biochemical composition of atherosclerotic plaques

D. Raju, et al. 2011

Study of Laser-Blow-Off Plume Dynamics Using Singular Value Decomposition Technique

J. Jánský, et al. 2011

Experimental and numerical study of the propagation of a discharge in a capillary tube in air at atmospheric pressure

J.E. Phipps 2011

Time-resolved fluorescence techniques for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease characterization

A.L. Rusanov, et al. 2010 Lifetime imaging of FRET between red fluorescent proteins
Y. Sun, et al. 2010 Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy for brain tumor image-guided surgery
A. Kumar, et al. 2010

Influence of laser beam intensity profile on propagation dynamics of laser-blow-off plasma plume

L. Marcu 2010

Fluorescence lifetime in cardiovascular diagnostics

R.K. Dey, et al. 2010

Report on Optical Absorption, Steady-state Emission and Time-resolved Emission Spectroscopy of Carbazole-based Conjugated Polymers

S. George, et al. 2010

Effect of ambient gas on the expansion dynamics of plasma plume formed by laser blow off of thin film

V. Jankus 2010

Study of Triplet Exciton Dynamics in Small Organic Molecule Films Using Time Resolved Optical Spectroscopy

S.E. Mani et al. 2009

Large third-order susceptibility and third-harmonic generation in centrosymmetric Cu2 O crystal

C.M. Brendel et al. 2009

Photophysical properties of the asymmetrically substituted spirobifluorenes spiro‐DPO and spiro‐MeO‐DPO

A. Kumar et al. 2009

An experimental setup to study the expansion dynamics of laser blow-off plasma plume in variable transverse magnetic field

Y. Sun et al. 2009

Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: in vivo application to diagnosis of oral carcinoma

S. Nagl et al. 2008

Microarray analysis of protein–protein interactions based on FRET using subnanosecond-resolved fluorescence lifetime imaging

K. Schoenbach et al. 2008

Electrical breakdown of water in microgaps

S. García-Revilla et al. 2008

Ultrafast random laser emission in a dye-doped silica gel powder

M. Laroussi 2007

Large Volume Non-Equilibrium Air Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure: A Novel Method with Low Power Requirements

D. Mathew et al. 2007

Effect of preionization, fluorine concentration, and current density on the discharge uniformity in F2 excimer laser gas mixtures

X.P. Lu et al. 2006

Temporal and spatial emission behaviour of homogeneous dielectric barrier discharge driven by unipolar sub-microsecond square pulses

D. Mathew et al. 2006

Influence of electrode materials and surface roughness on the homogeneity of discharges in fluorine-based excimer laser gas mixtures

D. Mathew et al. 2006

Current filamentation in discharge-excited F2 based excimer laser gas mixtures

K. Ferria et al. 2006

Acousto-optic lens based on interaction of narrow laser beam with cylindrical ultrasound

K. Landes et al. 2006

Diagnostics in plasma spraying techniques

C. Rothe et al. 2006

Systematic study of the dynamics of triplet exciton transfer between conjugated host polymers and phosphorescent iridium (III) guest emitters

X. Lu et al. 2006

Homogeneous dielectric barrier discharge in He/N2 mixtures driven by unipolar sub-microsecond square pulses

J.C. Bergstrom et al. 2006

The optical diagnostic beamline at the Canadian Light Source

C. Janzen et al. 2005

Analysis of small droplets with a new detector for liquid chromatography based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

C. Rothe et al. 2005

Effects of triplet exciton confinement induced by reduced conjugation length in polyspirobifluorene copolymers

S. Sinha et al. 2005

Delayed recombination of detrapped space-charge carriers in poly [2-methoxy-5-(2′-ethyl-hexyloxy)-1, 4-phenylene vinylene]-based light-emitting diode

C. Rothe et al. 2004

Triplet exciton state and related phenomena in the β-phase of poly (9, 9-dioctyl) fluorene

S. Zimmermann et al. 2004

A particle image shape imaging (PSI) investigation of particles in a plasma jet

S. Gundy et al. 2004

The use of chloroaluminium phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate (AlPcTS) for time-delayed fluorescence imaging

X.P. Lu et al. 2003

Ignition phase and steady-state structures of a non-thermal air plasma

X.P. Lu et al. 2003

Temporal emission behavior of pulsed discharge in water

S. Sinha et al. 2003

Electrophosphorescence and delayed electroluminescence from pristine polyfluorene thin-film devices at low temperature

S.I. Hintschich et al. 2003

Population and decay of keto states in conjugated polymers

C. Rothe et al. 2003

Triplet exciton migration in a conjugated polyfluorene

S. Sinha et al. 2003

Delayed electroluminescence via triplet–triplet annihilation in light emitting diodes based on poly [2-methoxy-5-(2′-ethyl-hexyloxy)-1, 4-phenylene vinylene]

S. Sinha et al. 2003

Space-charge-mediated delayed electroluminescence from polyfluorene thin films

S. Zimmermann et al. 2003

Particle Diagnostics in Plasma Spray Jets

S.L. Gundy et al. 2003

Time-gated fluorescence imaging of chloroaluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate in a tissue phantom

C. Rothe et al. 2002

Spectroscopic investigation of the different long-lived photoexcitations in a polythiophene

C. Rothe et al. 2002

Singlet and triplet energy transfer in a benzil-doped, light emitting, solid-state conjugated polymer

S. Sinha et al. 2002

Detailed investigations on the photophysical properties of poly (2, 5-pyridine diyl)

T.V. Streibla et al. 2001

Diagnostics of thermal spray processes by in-flight measurement of particle size and shape with innovative Particle-Shape-Imaging (PSI)

C. Rothe et al. 2001

Trap influenced properties of the delayed luminescence in thin solid films of the conjugated polymer Poly (9, 9-di (ethylhexyl) fluorene)